Orthogonal Cas9 Proteins for RNA-Guided Gene Regulation and Editing

ABSTRACT

Methods of modulating expression of a target nucleic acid in a cell are provided including use of multiple orthogonal Cas9 proteins to simultaneously and independently regulate corresponding genes or simultaneously and independently edit corresponding genes.

RELATED APPLICATION DATA

This application is a continuation application which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/411,793, filed on May 14, 2019, which is a continuation application which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/903,728, filed on Jan. 8, 2016, which is a National Stage Application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of co-pending PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/045700 designating the United States and filed Jul. 8, 2014; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/844,844 and filed Jul. 10, 2013 each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTERESTS

This invention was made with government support under Grant No. P50 HG005550 from the National Institutes of health and DE-FG02-02ER63445 from the Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.

SEQUENCE LISTING

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in XML format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said XML copy, created on Mar. 22, 2023, is named “Sequence_Listing_010498_01533_ST26” and is 51 KB in size.

BACKGROUND

Bacterial and archaeal CRISPR-Cas systems rely on short guide RNAs in complex with Cas proteins to direct degradation of complementary sequences present within invading foreign nucleic acid. See Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602-607 (2011); Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, E2579-2586 (2012); Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012); Sapranauskas, R. et al. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system provides immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic acids research 39, 9275-9282 (2011); and Bhaya, D., Davison, M. & Barrangou, R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annual review of genetics 45, 273-297 (2011). A recent in vitro reconstitution of the S. pyogenes type II CRISPR system demonstrated that crRNA (“CRISPR RNA”) fused to a normally trans-encoded tracrRNA (“trans-activating CRISPR RNA”) is sufficient to direct Cas9 protein to sequence-specifically cleave target DNA sequences matching the crRNA. Expressing a gRNA homologous to a target site results in Cas9 recruitment and degradation of the target DNA. See H. Deveau et al., Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. Journal of Bacteriology 190, 1390 (February, 2008).

SUMMARY

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a complex of a guide RNA, a DNA binding protein and a double stranded DNA target sequence. According to certain aspects, DNA binding proteins within the scope of the present disclosure include a protein that forms a complex with the guide RNA and with the guide RNA guiding the complex to a double stranded DNA sequence wherein the complex binds to the DNA sequence. This aspect of the present disclosure may be referred to as co-localization of the RNA and DNA binding protein to or with the double stranded DNA. In this manner, a DNA binding protein-guide RNA complex may be used to localize a transcriptional regulator protein or domain at target DNA so as to regulate expression of target DNA. According to one aspect, two or more or a plurality of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins or a set of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins, may be used to simultaneously and independently regulate genes in DNA in a cell. According to one aspect, two or more or a plurality of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins or a set of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins, may be used to simultaneously and independently edit genes in DNA in a cell. It is to be understood that where reference is made to a DNA binding protein or an RNA guided DNA binding proteins, such reference includes an orthogonal DNA binding protein or an orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding protein. Such orthogonal DNA binding proteins or orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins may have nuclease activity, they may have nickase activity or they may be nuclease null.

According to certain aspects, a method of modulating expression of a target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs (ribonucleic acids) complementary to DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), wherein the DNA includes the target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding a RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein, that binds to the DNA and is guided by the one or more RNAs, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator protein or domain, wherein the one or more RNAs, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein, and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain are expressed, wherein the one or more RNAs, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain co-localize to the DNA and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein. According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.

According to one aspect, the cell is a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a mammalian cell.

According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.

According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional repressor. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain downregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain downregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.

According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.

According to one aspect, the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.

According to certain aspects, a method of modulating expression of a target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs (ribonucleic acids) complementary to DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), wherein the DNA includes the target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding a RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding proteins of a Type II CRISPR System, that binds to the DNA and is guided by the one or more RNAs, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator protein or domain, wherein the one or more RNAs, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System, and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain are expressed, wherein the one or more RNAs, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain co-localize to the DNA and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System. According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.

According to one aspect, the cell is a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a mammalian cell.

According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.

According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.

According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.

According to one aspect, the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.

According to certain aspects, a method of modulating expression of a target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs (ribonucleic acids) complementary to DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), wherein the DNA includes the target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding a nuclease-null Cas9 protein that binds to the DNA and is guided by the one or more RNAs, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator protein or domain, wherein the one or more RNAs, the nuclease-null Cas9 protein, and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain are expressed, wherein the one or more RNAs, the nuclease-null Cas9 protein and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain co-localize to the DNA and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding a nuclease-null Cas9 protein further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to the nuclease-null Cas9 protein. According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.

According to one aspect, the cell is a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a mammalian cell.

According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.

According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.

According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.

According to one aspect, the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.

According to one aspect a cell is provided that includes a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs complementary to DNA, wherein the DNA includes a target nucleic acid, a second foreign nucleic acid encoding an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein, and a third foreign nucleic acid encoding a transcriptional regulator protein or domain wherein the one or more RNAs, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain are members of a co-localization complex for the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein. According to one aspect, the foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.

According to one aspect, the cell is a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a mammalian cell.

According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the RNA is between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.

According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. According to one aspect, the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition. According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.

According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.

According to one aspect, the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.

According to certain aspects, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein is an RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System. According to certain aspects, the RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding protein is a nuclease-null Cas9 protein.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided that includes introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase, which may be an orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase, and being guided by the two or more RNAs, wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase are expressed and wherein the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided that includes introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System and being guided by the two or more RNAs, wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System are expressed and wherein the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided that includes introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one Cas9 protein nickase having one inactive nuclease domain and being guided by the two or more RNAs, wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one Cas9 protein nickase are expressed and wherein the at least one Cas9 protein nickase co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks.

According to the methods of altering a DNA target nucleic acid, the two or more adjacent nicks are on the same strand of the double stranded DNA. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on the same strand of the double stranded DNA and result in homologous recombination. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and create double stranded breaks. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and create double stranded breaks resulting in nonhomologous end joining. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and are offset with respect to one another. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and are offset with respect to one another and create double stranded breaks. According to one aspect, the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and are offset with respect to one another and create double stranded breaks resulting in nonhomologous end joining. According to one aspect, the method further includes introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding a donor nucleic acid sequence wherein the two or more nicks results in homologous recombination of the target nucleic acid with the donor nucleic acid sequence.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase and being guided by the two or more RNAs, and wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase are expressed and wherein the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks, and wherein the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and create double stranded breaks resulting in fragmentation of the target nucleic acid thereby preventing expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR system and being guided by the two or more RNAs, and wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System are expressed and wherein the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks, and wherein the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and create double stranded breaks resulting in fragmentation of the target nucleic acid thereby preventing expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, a method of altering a DNA target nucleic acid in a cell is provided including introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in the DNA target nucleic acid, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one Cas9 protein nickase having one inactive nuclease domain and being guided by the two or more RNAs, and wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one Cas9 protein nickase are expressed and wherein the at least one Cas9 protein nickase co-localizes with the two or more RNAs to the DNA target nucleic acid and nicks the DNA target nucleic acid resulting in two or more adjacent nicks, and wherein the two or more adjacent nicks are on different strands of the double stranded DNA and create double stranded breaks resulting in fragmentation of the target nucleic acid thereby preventing expression of the target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, a cell is provided including a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with each RNA being complementary to an adjacent site in a DNA target nucleic acid, and a second foreign nucleic acid encoding at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase, and wherein the two or more RNAs and the at least one RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase are members of a co-localization complex for the DNA target nucleic acid.

According to one aspect, the RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase is an RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase of a Type II CRISPR System. According to one aspect, the RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase is a Cas9 protein nickase having one inactive nuclease domain.

According to one aspect, the cell is a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a mammalian cell.

According to one aspect, the RNA includes between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the RNA includes between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.

According to one aspect, the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.

According to one aspect, the two or more RNAs are guide RNAs. According to one aspect, the two or more RNAs are tracrRNA-crRNA fusions.

According to one aspect, the DNA target nucleic acid is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.

According to one aspect, methods may include the simultaneous use of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding protein nickases, orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding protein nucleases, orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding proteins. Accordingly, in the same cell, alterations created by nicking or cutting the DNA and translational mediation can be carried out. Further, one or more or a plurality of exogenous donor nucleic acids may also be added to a cell using methods known to those of skill in the art of introducing nucleic acids into cells, such as electroporation, and the one or more or a plurality of exogenous donor nucleic acids may be introduced into the DNA of the cell by recombination, such as homologous recombination, or other mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, the use of a plurality of orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins described herein allows a single cell to be altered by nicking or cutting, allows donor nucleic acids to be introduced into the DNA in the cell and allows genes to be transcriptionally regulated.

Further features and advantages of certain embodiments of the present invention will become more fully apparent in the following description of embodiments and drawings thereof, and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other features and advantages of the present embodiments will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1A and FIG. 1B are schematics of RNA-guided transcriptional activation. FIG. 1C is a design of a reporter construct. FIG. 1C discloses SEQ ID NOS: 2 and 3, respectively, in order of appearance. FIGS. 1D-1 and 1D-2 show data demonstrating that Cas9N-VP64 fusions display RNA-guided transcriptional activation as assayed by both fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and immunofluorescence assays (IF). FIGS. 1E-1 and 1E-2 show assay data by FACS and IF demonstrating gRNA sequence-specific transcriptional activation from reporter constructs in the presence of Cas9N, MS2-VP64 and gRNA bearing the appropriate MS2 aptamer binding sites. FIG. 1F depicts data demonstrating transcriptional induction by individual gRNAs and multiple gRNAs.

FIG. 2A depicts a methodology for evaluating the landscape of targeting by Cas9-gRNA complexes and TALEs. FIG. 2B depicts data demonstrating that a Cas9-gRNA complex is on average tolerant to 1-3 mutations in its target sequences. FIG. 2C depicts data demonstrating that the Cas9-gRNA complex is largely insensitive to point mutations, except those localized to the PAM sequence. FIG. 2D depicts heat plot data demonstrating that introduction of 2 base mismatches significantly impairs the Cas9-gRNA complex activity. FIG. 2E depicts data demonstrating that an 18-mer TALE reveals is on average tolerant to 1-2 mutations in its target sequence. FIG. 2F depicts data demonstrating the 18-mer TALE is, similar to the Cas9-gRNA complexes, largely insensitive to single base mismatched in its target. FIG. 2G depicts heat plot data demonstrating that introduction of 2 base mismatches significantly impairs the 18-mer TALE activity.

FIG. 3A depicts a schematic of a guide RNA design. FIG. 3B depicts data showing percentage rate of non-homologous end joining for off-set nicks leading to 5′ overhangs and off-set nicks leading to 5′ overhangs. FIG. 3C depicts data showing percentage rate of targeting for off-set nicks leading to 5′ overhangs and off-set nicks leading to 5′ overhangs.

FIG. 4A is a schematic of a metal coordinating residue in RuvC PDB ID: 4EP4 (blue) position D7 (left), a schematic of HNH endonuclease domains from PDB IDs: 3M7K (orange) and 4H9D (cyan) including a coordinated Mg-ion (gray sphere) and DNA from 3M7K (purple) (middle) and a list of mutants analyzed (right). FIG. 4B depicts data showing undetectable nuclease activity for Cas9 mutants m3 and m4, and also their respective fusions with VP64. FIG. 4C is a higher-resolution examination of the data in FIG. 4B.

FIG. 5A is a schematic of a homologous recombination assay to determine Cas9-gRNA activity. FIG. 5A discloses SEQ ID NO: 4. FIGS. 5B-1 and 5B-2 depict guide RNAs with random sequence insertions and percentage rate of homologous recombination. FIG. 5B-1 discloses SEQ ID NO: 5.

FIG. 6A is a schematic of guide RNAs for the OCT4 gene. FIG. 6B depicts transcriptional activation for a promoter-luciferase reporter construct. FIG. 6C depicts transcriptional activation via qPCR of endogenous genes.

FIG. 7A is a schematic of guide RNAs for the REX1 gene. FIG. 7B depicts transcriptional activation for a promoter-luciferase reporter construct. FIG. 7C depicts transcriptional activation via qPCR of endogenous genes.

FIG. 8A depicts in schematic a high level specificity analysis processing flow for calculation of normalized expression levels. FIG. 8B depicts data of distributions of percentages of binding sites by numbers of mismatches generated within a biased construct library. Left: Theoretical distribution. Right: Distribution observed from an actual TALE construct library. FIG. 8C depicts data of distributions of percentages of tag counts aggregated to binding sites by numbers of mismatches. Left: Distribution observed from the positive control sample. Right: Distribution observed from a sample in which a non-control TALE was induced.

FIG. 9A depicts data for analysis of the targeting landscape of a Cas9-gRNA complex showing tolerance to 1-3 mutations in its target sequence. FIG. 9B depicts data for analysis of the targeting landscape of a Cas9-gRNA complex showing insensitivity to point mutations, except those localized to the PAM sequence. FIG. 9C depicts heat plot data for analysis of the targeting landscape of a Cas9-gRNA complex showing that introduction of 2 base mismatches significantly impairs activity. FIG. 9D depicts data from a nuclease mediated HR assay confirming that the predicted PAM for the S. pyogenes Cas9 is NGG and also NAG. FIG. 9D discloses SEQ ID NOS: 6-9, respectively, in order of appearance.

FIGS. 10A-1 and 10A-2 depict data from a nuclease mediated HR assay confirming that 18-mer TALEs tolerate multiple mutations in their target sequences (SEQ ID NOS: 10-13, respectively, in order of appearance). FIG. 10B depicts data from analysis of the targeting landscape of TALEs of 3 different sizes (18-mer, 14-mer and 10-mer) (SEQ ID NOS: 14-16, respectively). FIG. 10C depicts data for 10-mer TALEs show near single-base mismatch resolution. FIG. 10D depicts heat plot data for 10-mer TALEs show near single-base mismatch resolution.

FIG. 11A depicts designed guide RNAs. FIG. 11B depicts percentage rate of non-homologous end joining for various guide RNAs (SEQ ID NOS: 17-30, respectively, in order of appearance).

FIGS. 12A-12F depict comparison and characterization of putatively orthogonal Cas9 proteins. FIG. 12A: Repeat sequences of SP (SEQ ID NO: 31), ST1 (SEQ ID NO: 32), NM (SEQ ID NO: 33), and TD (SEQ ID NO: 34). Bases are colored to indicate the degree of conservation. FIG. 12B: Plasmids used for characterization of Cas9 proteins in E. coli. FIG. 12C: Functional PAMs are depleted from the library when spacer and protospacer match due to Cas9 cutting. FIG. 12D: Cas9 does not cut when the targeting plasmid spacer and the library protospacer do not match. FIG. 12E: Nonfunctional PAMs are never cut or depleted. FIG. 12F: Selection scheme to identify PAMs. Cells expressing a Cas9 protein and one of two spacer-containing targeting plasmids were transformed with one of two libraries with corresponding protospacers and subjected to antibiotic selection. Surviving uncleaved plasmids were subjected to deep sequencing. Cas9-mediated PAM depletion was quantified by comparing the relative abundance of each sequence within the matched versus the mismatched protospacer libraries.

FIGS. 13A-13F depict depletion of functional protospacer-adjacent motifs (PAMs) from libraries by Cas9 proteins. The log frequency of each base at every position for matched spacer-protospacer pairs is plotted relative to control conditions in which spacer and protospacer do not match. Results reflect the mean depletion of libraries by NM (FIG. 13A), ST1 (FIG. 13B), and TD (FIG. 13C) based on two distinct protospacer sequences (SEQ ID NOS: 35-36, respectively, in order of appearance) (FIG. 13D). Depletion of specific sequences for each protospacer are plotted separately for each Cas9 protein (FIGS. 13E-13F).

FIGS. 14A-14B depict transcriptional repression mediated by NM. FIG. 14A: Reporter plasmid used to quantify repression. FIG. 14B: Normalized cellular fluorescence for matched and mismatched spacer-protospacer pairs. Error bars represent the standard deviation across five replicates.

FIG. 15 depicts orthogonal recognition of crRNAs in E. coli. Cells with all combinations of Cas9 and crRNA were challenged with a plasmid bearing a matched or mismatched protospacer and appropriate PAM. Sufficient cells were plated to reliably obtain colonies from matching spacer and protospacer pairings and total colony counts used to calculate the fold depletion.

FIGS. 16A, 16B1 and 16B-2 depict Cas9-mediated gene editing in human cells. FIG. 16A: A homologous recombination assay was used to quantify gene editing efficiency. Cas9-mediated double-strand breaks within the protospacer stimulated repair of the interrupted GFP cassette using the donor template, yielding cells with intact GFP. Three different templates were used in order to provide the correct PAM for each Cas9. Fluorescent cells were quantified by flow cytometry. FIG. 16A discloses SEQ ID NOS: 37-39, respectively, in order of appearance. FIGS. 16B-1 and 16B-2 : Cell sorting results for NM, ST1, and TD in combination with each of their respective sgRNAs. The protospacer and PAM sequence (SEQ ID NOS: 37-39, respectively, in order of appearance) for each Cas9 are displayed above each set. Repair efficiencies are indicated in the upper-right corner of each plot.

FIGS. 17A, 17B-1 and 17B-2 depict transcriptional activation in human cells. FIG. 17A: Reporter constructs for transcriptional activation featured a minimal promoter driving tdTomato. Protospacer and PAM sequences (SEQ ID NOS: 37-39, respectively, in order of appearance) were placed upstream of the minimal promoter. Nuclease-null Cas9-VP64 fusion proteins binding to the protospacers resulted in transcriptional activation and enhanced fluorescence. FIGS. 17B-1 and 17B-2 : Cells transfected with all combinations of Cas9 activator and sgRNA and tdTomato fluorescent visualized. Transcriptional activation occurred only when each Cas9 was paired with its own sgRNA.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Supporting references listed herein may be referred to by superscript. It is to be understood that the superscript refers to the reference as if fully set forth to support a particular statement.

The CRISPR-Cas systems of bacteria and archaea confer acquired immunity by incorporating fragments of viral or plasmid DNA into CRISPR loci and utilizing the transcribed crRNAs to guide nucleases to degrade homologous sequences^(1, 2). In Type II CRISPR systems, a ternary complex of Cas9 nuclease with crRNA and tracrRNA (trans-activating crRNA) binds to and cleaves dsDNA protospacer sequences that match the crRNA spacer and also contain a short protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM)^(3, 4). Fusing the crRNA and tracrRNA produces a single guide RNA (sgRNA) that is sufficient to target Cas94.

As an RNA-guided nuclease and nickase, Cas9 has been adapted for targeted gene editing⁵⁻⁹ and selection¹⁰ in a variety of organisms. While these successes are arguably transformative, nuclease-null Cas9 variants are useful for regulatory purposes, as the ability to localize proteins and RNA to nearly any set of dsDNA sequences affords tremendous versatility for controlling biological systems¹¹⁻¹⁷. Beginning with targeted gene repression through promoter and 5′-UTR obstruction in bacteria¹⁸, Cas9-mediated regulation is extended to transcriptional activation by means of VP64¹⁹ recruitment in human cells. According to certain aspects the DNA binding proteins described herein, including the orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins such as orthogonal Cas9 proteins, may be used with transcriptional activators, repressors, fluorescent protein labels, chromosome tethers, and numerous other tools known to those of skill in the art. According to this aspect, use of orthogonal Cas9 allows genetic modification using any and all of transcriptional activators, repressors, fluorescent protein labels, chromosome tethers, and numerous other tools known to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, aspect of the present disclosure are directed to the use of orthogonal Cas9 proteins for multiplexed RNA-guided transcriptional activation, repression, and gene editing.

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to characterizing and demonstrating orthogonality between multiple Cas9 proteins in bacteria and human cells. Such orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins may be used in a plurality or set to simultaneously and independently regulate transcription, label or edit a plurality of genes in DNA of individual cells.

According to one aspect, a plurality of orthogonal Cas9 proteins are identified from within a single family of CRISPR systems. Though clearly related, exemplary Cas9 proteins from S. pyogenes, N. meningitidis, S. thermophilus, and T. denticola range from 3.25 to 4.6 kb in length and recognize completely different PAM sequences.

Embodiments of the present disclosure are based on the use of DNA binding proteins to co-localize transcriptional regulator proteins or domains to DNA in a manner to regulate a target nucleic acid. Such DNA binding proteins are readily known to those of skill in the art to bind to DNA for various purposes. Such DNA binding proteins may be naturally occurring. DNA binding proteins included within the scope of the present disclosure include those which may be guided by RNA, referred to herein as guide RNA. According to this aspect, the guide RNA and the RNA guided DNA binding protein form a co-localization complex at the DNA. According to certain aspects, the DNA binding protein may be a nuclease-null DNA binding protein. According to this aspect, the nuclease-null DNA binding protein may result from the alteration or modification of a DNA binding protein having nuclease activity. Such DNA binding proteins having nuclease activity are known to those of skill in the art, and include naturally occurring DNA binding proteins having nuclease activity, such as Cas9 proteins present, for example, in Type II CRISPR systems. Such Cas9 proteins and Type II CRISPR systems are well documented in the art. See Makarova et al., Nature Reviews, Microbiology, Vol. 9, June 2011, pp. 467-477 including all supplementary information hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

According to a certain aspect, methods are provided to identify two or more or a plurality or a set of orthogonal DNA binding proteins, such as orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins, such as orthogonal RNA guided DNA binding proteins of a Type II CRISPR system, such as orthogonal cas9 proteins, each of which may be nuclease active or nuclease null. According to certain aspects, two or more or a plurality or a set of orthogonal DNA binding proteins may be used with corresponding guide RNAs to simultaneously and independently regulate genes or edit nucleic acids within a cell. According to certain aspects, nucleic acids may be introduced into the cell which encode for the two or more or a plurality or a set of orthogonal DNA binding proteins, the corresponding guide RNAs and two or more or a plurality or a set of corresponding transcriptional regulators or domains. In this manner, many genes may be target in parallel within the same cell for regulation or editing. Methods of editing genomic DNA are well known to those of skill in the art.

Exemplary DNA binding proteins having nuclease activity function to nick or cut double stranded DNA. Such nuclease activity may result from the DNA binding protein having one or more polypeptide sequences exhibiting nuclease activity. Such exemplary DNA binding proteins may have two separate nuclease domains with each domain responsible for cutting or nicking a particular strand of the double stranded DNA. Exemplary polypeptide sequences having nuclease activity known to those of skill in the art include the McrA-HNH nuclease related domain and the RuvC-like nuclease domain. Accordingly, exemplary DNA binding proteins are those that in nature contain one or more of the McrA-HNH nuclease related domain and the RuvC-like nuclease domain. According to certain aspects, the DNA binding protein is altered or otherwise modified to inactivate the nuclease activity. Such alteration or modification includes altering one or more amino acids to inactivate the nuclease activity or the nuclease domain. Such modification includes removing the polypeptide sequence or polypeptide sequences exhibiting nuclease activity, i.e. the nuclease domain, such that the polypeptide sequence or polypeptide sequences exhibiting nuclease activity, i.e. nuclease domain, are absent from the DNA binding protein. Other modifications to inactivate nuclease activity will be readily apparent to one of skill in the art based on the present disclosure. Accordingly, a nuclease-null DNA binding protein includes polypeptide sequences modified to inactivate nuclease activity or removal of a polypeptide sequence or sequences to inactivate nuclease activity. The nuclease-null DNA binding protein retains the ability to bind to DNA even though the nuclease activity has been inactivated. Accordingly, the DNA binding protein includes the polypeptide sequence or sequences required for DNA binding but may lack the one or more or all of the nuclease sequences exhibiting nuclease activity. Accordingly, the DNA binding protein includes the polypeptide sequence or sequences required for DNA binding but may have one or more or all of the nuclease sequences exhibiting nuclease activity inactivated.

According to one aspect, a DNA binding protein having two or more nuclease domains may be modified or altered to inactivate all but one of the nuclease domains. Such a modified or altered DNA binding protein is referred to as a DNA binding protein nickase, to the extent that the DNA binding protein cuts or nicks only one strand of double stranded DNA. When guided by RNA to DNA, the DNA binding protein nickase is referred to as an RNA guided DNA binding protein nickase.

An exemplary DNA binding protein is an RNA guided DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System which lacks nuclease activity. An exemplary DNA binding protein is a nuclease-null Cas9 protein. An exemplary DNA binding protein is a Cas9 protein nickase.

In S. pyogenes, Cas9 generates a blunt-ended double-stranded break 3 bp upstream of the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) via a process mediated by two catalytic domains in the protein: an HNH domain that cleaves the complementary strand of the DNA and a RuvC-like domain that cleaves the non-complementary strand. See Jinke et al., Science 337, 816-821 (2012) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Cas9 proteins are known to exist in many Type II CRISPR systems including the following as identified in the supplementary information to Makarova et al., Nature Reviews, Microbiology, Vol. 9, June 2011, pp. 467-477: Methanococcus maripaludis C7; Corynebacterium diphtheriae; Corynebacterium efficiens YS-314; Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 Kitasato; Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 Bielefeld; Corynebacterium glutamicum R; Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii DSM 44385; Mycobacterium abscessus ATCC 19977; Nocardia farcinica IFM10152; Rhodococcus erythropolis PR4; Rhodococcus jostii RHA1; Rhodococcus opacus B4 uid36573; Acidothermus cellulolyticus 11B; Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus A6; Kribbella flavida DSM 17836 uid43465; Thermomonospora curvata DSM 43183; Bifidobacterium dentium Bd1; Bifidobacterium longum DJO10A; Slackia heliotrinireducens DSM 20476; Persephonella marina EX H1; Bacteroides fragilis NCTC 9434; Capnocytophaga ochracea DSM 7271; Flavobacterium psychrophilum JIP02 86; Akkermansia muciniphila ATCC BAA 835; Roseiflexus castenholzii DSM 13941; Roseiflexus RS1; Synechocystis PCC6803; Elusimicrobium minutum Pei191; uncultured Termite group 1 bacterium phylotype Rs D17; Fibrobacter succinogenes S85; Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987; Listeria innocua; Lactobacillus casei; Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; Lactobacillus salivarius UCC118; Streptococcus agalactiae A909; Streptococcus agalactiae NEM316; Streptococcus agalactiae 2603; Streptococcus dysgalactiae equisimilis GGS 124; Streptococcus equi zooepidemicus MGCS10565; Streptococcus gallolyticus UCN34 uid46061; Streptococcus gordonii Challis subst CH1; Streptococcus mutans NN2025 uid46353; Streptococcus mutans; Streptococcus pyogenes M1 GAS; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS5005; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS2096; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS9429; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS10270; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS6180; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS315; Streptococcus pyogenes SSI-1; Streptococcus pyogenes MGAS10750; Streptococcus pyogenes NZ131; Streptococcus thermophiles CNRZ1066; Streptococcus thermophiles LMD-9; Streptococcus thermophiles LMG 18311; Clostridium botulinum A3 Loch Maree; Clostridium botulinum B Eklund 17B; Clostridium botulinum Ba4 657; Clostridium botulinum F Langeland; Clostridium cellulolyticum H10; Finegoldia magna ATCC 29328; Eubacterium rectale ATCC 33656; Mycoplasma gallisepticum; Mycoplasma mobile 163K; Mycoplasma penetrans; Mycoplasma synoviae 53; Streptobacillus moniliformis DSM 12112; Bradyrhizobium BTAi1; Nitrobacter hamburgensis X14; Rhodopseudomonas palustris BisB18; Rhodopseudomonas palustris BisB5; Parvibaculum lavamentivorans DS-1; Dinoroseobacter shibae DFL 12; Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Pal 5 FAPERJ; Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Pal 5 JGI; Azospirillum B510 uid46085; Rhodospirillum rubrum ATCC 11170; Diaphorobacter TPSY uid29975; Verminephrobacter eiseniae EF01-2; Neisseria meningitides 053442; Neisseria meningitides alpha14; Neisseria meningitides Z2491; Desulfovibrio salexigens DSM 2638; Campylobacter jejuni doylei 269 97; Campylobacter jejuni 81116; Campylobacter jejuni; Campylobacter lari RM2100; Helicobacter hepaticus; Wolinella succinogenes; Tolumonas auensis DSM 9187; Pseudoalteromonas atlantica T6c; Shewanella pealeana ATCC 700345; Legionella pneumophila Paris; Actinobacillus succinogenes 130Z; Pasteurella multocida; Francisella tularensis novicida U112; Francisella tularensis holarctica; Francisella tularensis FSC 198; Francisella tularensis tularensis; Francisella tularensis WY96-3418; and Treponema denticola ATCC 35405. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a Cas9 protein present in a Type II CRISPR system, which has been rendered nuclease null or which has been rendered a nickase as described herein.

The Cas9 protein may be referred by one of skill in the art in the literature as Csn1. The S. pyogenes Cas9 protein sequence that is the subject of experiments described herein is shown below. See Deltcheva et al., Nature 471, 602-607 (2011) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

MDKKYSIGLDIGTNSVGWAVITDEYKVPSKKFKVLGNTDRHSIKKNLIG ALLFDSGETAEATRLKRTARRRYTRRKNRICYLQEIFSNEMAKVDDSFF HRLEESFLVEEDKKHERHPIFGNIVDEVAYHEKYPTIYHLRKKLVDSTD KADLRLIYLALAHMIKFRGHFLIEGDLNPDNSDVDKLFIQLVQTYNQLF EENPINASGVDAKAILSARLSKSRRLENLIAQLPGEKKNGLFGNLIALS LGLTPNFKSNFDLAEDAKLQLSKDTYDDDLDNLLAQIGDQYADLFLAAK NLSDAILLSDILRVNTEITKAPLSASMIKRYDEHHQDLTLLKALVRQQL PEKYKEIFFDQSKNGYAGYIDGGASQEEFYKFIKPILEKMDGTEELLVK LNREDLLRKQRTFDNGSIPHQIHLGELHAILRRQEDFYPFLKDNREKIE KILTFRIPYYVGPLARGNSRFAWMTRKSEETITPWNFEEVVDKGASAQS FIERMTNFDKNLPNEKVLPKHSLLYEYFTVYNELTKVKYVTEGMRKPFL SGEQKKAIVDLLFKTNRKVTVKQLKEDYFKKIECFDSVEISGVEDRFNA SLGTYHDLLKIIKDKDFLDNEENEDILEDIVLTLTLFEDREMIEERLKT YAHLFDDKVMKQLKRRRYTGWGRLSRKLINGIRDKQSGKTILDFLKSDG FANRNFMQLIHDDSLTFKEDIQKAQVSGQGDSLHEHIANLAGSPAIKKG ILQTVKVVDELVKVMGRHKPENIVIEMARENQTTQKGQKNSRERMKRIE EGIKELGSQILKEHPVENTQLQNEKLYLYYLQNGRDMYVDQELDINRLS DYDVDHIVPQSFLKDDSIDNKVLTRSDKNRGKSDNVPSEEVVKKMKNYW RQLLNAKLITQRKFDNLTKAERGGLSELDKAGFIKRQLVETRQITKHVA QILDSRMNTKYDENDKLIREVKVITLKSKLVSDFRKDFQFYKVREINNY HHAHDAYLNAVVGTALIKKYPKLESEFVYGDYKVYDVRKMIAKSEQEIG KATAKYFFYSNIMNFFKTEITLANGEIRKRPLIETNGETGEIVWDKGRD FATVRKVLSMPQVNIVKKTEVQTGGFSKESILPKRNSDKLIARKKDWDP KKYGGFDSPTVAYSVLVVAKVEKGKSKKLKSVKELLGITIMERSSFEKN PIDFLEAKGYKEVKKDLIIKLPKYSLFELENGRKRMLASAGELQKGNEL ALPSKYVNFLYLASHYEKLKGSPEDNEQKQLFVEQHKHYLDEIIEQISE FSKRVILADANLDKVLSAYNKHRDKPIREQAENIIHLFTLTNLGAPAAF KYFDTTIDRKRYTSTKEVLDATLIHQSITGLYETRIDLSQLGGD-

According to certain aspects of methods of RNA-guided genome regulation described herein, Cas9 is altered to reduce, substantially reduce or eliminate nuclease activity. Such a Cas9 may be an orthogonal Cas9, such as when more than one Cas9 proteins are envisioned. In this context, two or more or a plurality or set of orthogonal Cas9 proteins may be used in the methods described herein. According to one aspect, Cas9 nuclease activity is reduced, substantially reduced or eliminated by altering the RuvC nuclease domain or the HNH nuclease domain. According to one aspect, the RuvC nuclease domain is inactivated. According to one aspect, the HNH nuclease domain is inactivated. According to one aspect, the RuvC nuclease domain and the HNH nuclease domain are inactivated. According to an additional aspect, Cas9 proteins are provided where the RuvC nuclease domain and the HNH nuclease domain are inactivated. According to an additional aspect, nuclease-null Cas9 proteins are provided insofar as the RuvC nuclease domain and the HNH nuclease domain are inactivated. According to an additional aspect, a Cas9 nickase is provided where either the RuvC nuclease domain or the HNH nuclease domain is inactivated, thereby leaving the remaining nuclease domain active for nuclease activity. In this manner, only one strand of the double stranded DNA is cut or nicked.

According to an additional aspect, nuclease-null Cas9 proteins are provided where one or more amino acids in Cas9 are altered or otherwise removed to provide nuclease-null Cas9 proteins. According to one aspect, the amino acids include D10 and H840. See Jinke et al., Science 337, 816-821 (2012). According to an additional aspect, the amino acids include D839 and N863. According to one aspect, one or more or all of D10, H840, D839 and H863 are substituted with an amino acid which reduces, substantially eliminates or eliminates nuclease activity. According to one aspect, one or more or all of D10, H840, D839 and H863 are substituted with alanine. According to one aspect, a Cas9 protein having one or more or all of D10, H840, D839 and H863 substituted with an amino acid which reduces, substantially eliminates or eliminates nuclease activity, such as alanine, is referred to as a nuclease-null Cas9 or Cas9N and exhibits reduced or eliminated nuclease activity, or nuclease activity is absent or substantially absent within levels of detection. According to this aspect, nuclease activity for a Cas9N may be undetectable using known assays, i.e. below the level of detection of known assays.

According to one aspect, the nuclease null Cas9 protein includes homologs and orthologs thereof which retain the ability of the protein to bind to the DNA and be guided by the RNA. According to one aspect, the nuclease null Cas9 protein includes the sequence as set forth for naturally occurring Cas9 from S. pyogenes and having one or more or all of D10, H840, D839 and H863 substituted with alanine and protein sequences having at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 99% homology thereto and being a DNA binding protein, such as an RNA guided DNA binding protein.

According to one aspect, the nuclease null Cas9 protein includes the sequence as set forth for naturally occurring Cas9 from S. pyogenes excepting the protein sequence of the RuvC nuclease domain and the HNH nuclease domain and also protein sequences having at least 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98% or 99% homology thereto and being a DNA binding protein, such as an RNA guided DNA binding protein. In this manner, aspects of the present disclosure include the protein sequence responsible for DNA binding, for example, for co-localizing with guide RNA and binding to DNA and protein sequences homologous thereto, and need not include the protein sequences for the RuvC nuclease domain and the HNH nuclease domain (to the extent not needed for DNA binding), as these domains may be either inactivated or removed from the protein sequence of the naturally occurring Cas9 protein to produce a nuclease null Cas9 protein.

For purposes of the present disclosure, FIG. 4A depicts metal coordinating residues in known protein structures with homology to Cas9. Residues are labeled based on position in Cas9 sequence. Left: RuvC structure, PDB ID: 4EP4 (blue) position D7, which corresponds to D10 in the Cas9 sequence, is highlighted in a Mg-ion coordinating position. Middle: Structures of HNH endonuclease domains from PDB IDs: 3M7K (orange) and 4H9D (cyan) including a coordinated Mg-ion (gray sphere) and DNA from 3M7K (purple). Residues D92 and N113 in 3M7K and 4H9D positions D53 and N77, which have sequence homology to Cas9 amino acids D839 and N863, are shown as sticks. Right: List of mutants made and analyzed for nuclease activity: Cas9 wildtype; Cas9_(m1) which substitutes alanine for D10; Cas9_(m2) which substitutes alanine for D10 and alanine for H840; Cas9_(m3) which substitutes alanine for D10, alanine for H840, and alanine for D839; and Cas9_(m4) which substitutes alanine for D10, alanine for H840, alanine for D839, and alanine for N863.

As shown in FIG. 4B, the Cas9 mutants: m3 and m4, and also their respective fusions with VP64 showed undetectable nuclease activity upon deep sequencing at targeted loci. The plots show the mutation frequency versus genomic position, with the red lines demarcating the gRNA target. FIG. 4C is a higher-resolution examination of the data in FIG. 4B and confirms that the mutation landscape shows comparable profile as unmodified loci.

According to one aspect, an engineered Cas9-gRNA system is provided which enables RNA-guided genome regulation in human cells by tethering transcriptional activation domains to either a nuclease-null Cas9 or to guide RNAs. According to one aspect of the present disclosure, one or more transcriptional regulatory proteins or domains (such terms are used interchangeably) are joined or otherwise connected to a nuclease-deficient Cas9 or one or more guide RNA (gRNA). The transcriptional regulatory domains correspond to targeted loci. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure include methods and materials for localizing transcriptional regulatory domains to targeted loci by fusing, connecting or joining such domains to either Cas9N or to the gRNA.

According to one aspect, a Cas9N-fusion protein capable of transcriptional activation is provided. According to one aspect, a VP64 activation domain (see Zhang et al., Nature Biotechnology 29, 149-153 (2011) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) is joined, fused, connected or otherwise tethered to the C terminus of Cas9N. According to one method, the transcriptional regulatory domain is provided to the site of target genomic DNA by the Cas9N protein. According to one method, a Cas9N fused to a transcriptional regulatory domain is provided within a cell along with one or more guide RNAs. The Cas9N with the transcriptional regulatory domain fused thereto bind at or near target genomic DNA. The one or more guide RNAs bind at or near target genomic DNA. The transcriptional regulatory domain regulates expression of the target gene. According to a specific aspect, a Cas9N-VP64 fusion activated transcription of reporter constructs when combined with gRNAs targeting sequences near the promoter, thereby displaying RNA-guided transcriptional activation.

According to one aspect, a gRNA-fusion protein capable of transcriptional activation is provided. According to one aspect, a VP64 activation domain is joined, fused, connected or otherwise tethered to the gRNA. According to one method, the transcriptional regulatory domain is provided to the site of target genomic DNA by the gRNA. According to one method, a gRNA fused to a transcriptional regulatory domain is provided within a cell along with a Cas9N protein. The Cas9N binds at or near target genomic DNA. The one or more guide RNAs with the transcriptional regulatory protein or domain fused thereto bind at or near target genomic DNA. The transcriptional regulatory domain regulates expression of the target gene. According to a specific aspect, a Cas9N protein and a gRNA fused with a transcriptional regulatory domain activated transcription of reporter constructs, thereby displaying RNA-guided transcriptional activation.

The gRNA tethers capable of transcriptional regulation were constructed by identifying which regions of the gRNA will tolerate modifications by inserting random sequences into the gRNA and assaying for Cas9 function. gRNAs bearing random sequence insertions at either the 5′ end of the crRNA portion or the 3′ end of the tracrRNA portion of a chimeric gRNA retain functionality, while insertions into the tracrRNA scaffold portion of the chimeric gRNA result in loss of function. See FIGS. 5A, 5B-1 and 5B-2 summarizing gRNA flexibility to random base insertions. FIG. 5A is a schematic of a homologous recombination (HR) assay to determine Cas9-gRNA activity. As shown in FIG. 5B, gRNAs bearing random sequence insertions at either the 5′ end of the crRNA portion or the 3′ end of the tracrRNA portion of a chimeric gRNA retain functionality, while insertions into the tracrRNA scaffold portion of the chimeric gRNA result in loss of function. The points of insertion in the gRNA sequence are indicated by red nucleotides. Without wishing to be bound by scientific theory, the increased activity upon random base insertions at the 5′ end may be due to increased half-life of the longer gRNA.

To attach VP64 to the gRNA, two copies of the MS2 bacteriophage coat-protein binding RNA stem-loop were appended to the 3′ end of the gRNA. See Fusco et al., Current Biology: CB13, 161-167 (2003) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. These chimeric gRNAs were expressed together with Cas9N and MS2-VP64 fusion protein. Sequence-specific transcriptional activation from reporter constructs was observed in the presence of all 3 components.

FIG. 1A is a schematic of RNA-guided transcriptional activation. As shown in FIG. 1A, to generate a Cas9N-fusion protein capable of transcriptional activation, the VP64 activation domain was directly tethered to the C terminus of Cas9N. As shown in FIG. 1B, to generate gRNA tethers capable of transcriptional activation, two copies of the MS2 bacteriophage coat-protein binding RNA stem-loop were appended to the 3′ end of the gRNA. These chimeric gRNAs were expressed together with Cas9N and MS2-VP64 fusion protein. FIG. 1C shows design of reporter constructs used to assay transcriptional activation. The two reporters bear distinct gRNA target sites, and share a control TALE-TF target site. As shown in FIGS. 1D-1 and 1D-2 , Cas9N-VP64 fusions display RNA-guided transcriptional activation as assayed by both fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and immunofluorescence assays (IF). Specifically, while the control TALE-TF activated both reporters, the Cas9N-VP64 fusion activates reporters in a gRNA sequence specific manner. As shown in FIGS. 1E-1 and 1E-2 , gRNA sequence-specific transcriptional activation from reporter constructs only in the presence of all 3 components: Cas9N, MS2-VP64 and gRNA bearing the appropriate MS2 aptamer binding sites was observed by both FACS and IF.

According to certain aspects, methods are provided for regulating endogenous genes using Cas9N, one or more gRNAs and a transcriptional regulatory protein or domain. According to one aspect, an endogenous gene can be any desired gene, referred to herein as a target gene. According to one exemplary aspect, genes target for regulation included ZFP42 (REX1) and POU5F1 (OCT4), which are both tightly regulated genes involved in maintenance of pluripotency. As shown in FIG. 1F, 10 gRNAs targeting a ˜5 kb stretch of DNA upstream of the transcription start site (DNase hypersensitive sites are highlighted in green) were designed for the REX1 gene. Transcriptional activation was assayed using either a promoter-luciferase reporter construct (see Takahashi et al., Cell 131 861-872 (2007) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) or directly via qPCR of the endogenous genes.

FIGS. 6A-6D are directed to RNA-guided OCT4 regulation using Cas9N-VP64. As shown in FIG. 6A, 21 gRNAs targeting a ˜5 kb stretch of DNA upstream of the transcription start site were designed for the OCT4 gene. The DNase hypersensitive sites are highlighted in green. FIG. 6B shows transcriptional activation using a promoter-luciferase reporter construct. FIG. 6C shows transcriptional activation directly via qPCR of the endogenous genes. While introduction of individual gRNAs modestly stimulated transcription, multiple gRNAs acted synergistically to stimulate robust multi-fold transcriptional activation.

FIGS. 7A-7C are directed to RNA-guided REX1 regulation using Cas9N, MS2-VP64 and gRNA+2X-MS2 aptamers. As shown in FIG. 7A, 10 gRNAs targeting a ˜5 kb stretch of DNA upstream of the transcription start site were designed for the REX1 gene. The DNase hypersensitive sites are highlighted in green. FIG. 7B shows transcriptional activation using a promoter-luciferase reporter construct. FIG. 7C shows transcriptional activation directly via qPCR of the endogenous genes. While introduction of individual gRNAs modestly stimulated transcription, multiple gRNAs acted synergistically to stimulate robust multi-fold transcriptional activation. In one aspect, the absence of the 2X-MS2 aptamers on the gRNA does not result in transcriptional activation. See Maeder et al., Nature Methods 10, 243-245 (2013) and Perez-Pinera et al., Nature Methods 10, 239-242 (2013) each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Accordingly, methods are directed to the use of multiple guide RNAs with a Cas9N protein and a transcriptional regulatory protein or domain to regulate expression of a target gene.

Both the Cas9 and gRNA tethering approaches were effective, with the former displaying ˜1.5-2 fold higher potency. This difference is likely due to the requirement for 2-component as opposed to 3-component complex assembly. However, the gRNA tethering approach in principle enables different effector domains to be recruited by distinct gRNAs so long as each gRNA uses a different RNA-protein interaction pair. See Karyer-Bibens et al., Biology of the Cell/Under the Auspices of the European Cell Biology Organization 100, 125-138 (2008) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. According to one aspect of the present disclosure, different target genes may be regulated using specific guide RNA and a generic Cas9N protein, i.e. the same or a similar Cas9N protein for different target genes. According to one aspect, methods of multiplex gene regulation are provided using the same or similar Cas9N.

Methods of the present disclosure are also directed to editing target genes using the Cas9N proteins and guide RNAs described herein to provide multiplex genetic and epigenetic engineering of human cells. With Cas9-gRNA targeting being an issue (see Jiang et al., Nature Biotechnology 31, 233-239 (2013) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety), methods are provided for in-depth interrogation of Cas9 affinity for a very large space of target sequence variations. Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure provide direct high-throughput readout of Cas9 targeting in human cells, while avoiding complications introduced by dsDNA cut toxicity and mutagenic repair incurred by specificity testing with native nuclease-active Cas9.

Further aspects of the present disclosure are directed to the use of DNA binding proteins or systems in general for the transcriptional regulation of a target gene. One of skill in the art will readily identify exemplary DNA binding systems based on the present disclosure. Such DNA binding systems need not have any nuclease activity, as with the naturally occurring Cas9 protein. Accordingly, such DNA binding systems need not have nuclease activity inactivated. One exemplary DNA binding system is TALE. According to one aspect, TALE specificity was evaluated using the methodology shown in FIG. 2A. A construct library in which each element of the library comprises a minimal promoter driving a dTomato fluorescent protein is designed. Downstream of the transcription start site m, a 24 bp (A/C/G) random transcript tag is inserted, while two TF binding sites are placed upstream of the promoter: one is a constant DNA sequence shared by all library elements, and the second is a variable feature that bears a ‘biased’ library of binding sites which are engineered to span a large collection of sequences that present many combinations of mutations away from the target sequence the programmable DNA targeting complex was designed to bind. This is achieved using degenerate oligonucleotides engineered to bear nucleotide frequencies at each position such that the target sequence nucleotide appears at a 79% frequency and each other nucleotide occurs at 7% frequency. See Patwardhan et al., Nature Biotechnology 30, 265-270 (2012) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The reporter library is then sequenced to reveal the associations between the 24 bp dTomato transcript tags and their corresponding ‘biased’ target site in the library element. The large diversity of the transcript tags assures that sharing of tags between different targets will be extremely rare, while the biased construction of the target sequences means that sites with few mutations will be associated with more tags than sites with more mutations. Next, transcription of the dTomato reporter genes is stimulated with either a control-TF engineered to bind the shared DNA site, or the target-TF that was engineered to bind the target site. The abundance of each expressed transcript tag is measured in each sample by conducting RNAseq on the stimulated cells, which is then mapped back to their corresponding binding sites using the association table established earlier. The control-TF is expected to excite all library members equally since its binding site is shared across all library elements, while the target-TF is expected to skew the distribution of the expressed members to those that are preferentially targeted by it. This assumption is used in step 5 to compute a normalized expression level for each binding site by dividing the tag counts obtained for the target-TF by those obtained for the control-TF.

As shown in FIG. 2B, the targeting landscape of a Cas9-gRNA complex reveals that it is on average tolerant to 1-3 mutations in its target sequences. As shown in FIG. 2C, the Cas9-gRNA complex is also largely insensitive to point mutations, except those localized to the PAM sequence. Notably this data reveals that the predicted PAM for the S. pyogenes Cas9 is not just NGG but also NAG. As shown in FIG. 2D, introduction of 2 base mismatches significantly impairs the Cas9-gRNA complex activity, however only when these are localized to the 8-10 bases nearer the 3′ end of the gRNA target sequence (in the heat plot the target sequence positions are labeled from 1-23 starting from the 5′ end).

The mutational tolerance of another widely used genome editing tool, TALE domains, was determined using the transcriptional specificity assay described herein. As shown in FIG. 2E, the TALE off-targeting data for an 18-mer TALE reveals that it can tolerate on average 1-2 mutations in its target sequence, and fails to activate a large majority of 3 base mismatch variants in its targets. As shown in FIG. 2F, the 18-mer TALE is, similar to the Cas9-gRNA complexes, largely insensitive to single base mismatched in its target. As shown in FIG. 2G, introduction of 2 base mismatches significantly impairs the 18-mer TALE activity. TALE activity is more sensitive to mismatches nearer the 5′ end of its target sequence (in the heat plot the target sequence positions are labeled from 1-18 starting from the 5′ end).

Results were confirmed using targeted experiments in a nuclease assay which is the subject of FIGS. 10A-10D directed to evaluating the landscape of targeting by TALEs of different sizes. As shown in FIG. 10A, using a nuclease mediated HR assay, it was confirmed that 18-mer TALEs tolerate multiple mutations in their target sequences. As shown in FIG. 10B, using the approach described in FIG. 2A, the targeting landscape of TALEs of 3 different sizes (18-mer, 14-mer and 10-mer) was analyzed. Shorter TALEs (14-mer and 10-mer) are progressively more specific in their targeting but also reduced in activity by nearly an order of magnitude. As shown in FIGS. 10C and 10D, 10-mer TALEs show near single-base mismatch resolution, losing almost all activity against targets bearing 2 mismatches (in the heat plot the target sequence positions are labeled from 1-10 starting from the 5′ end). Taken together, these data imply that engineering shorter TALEs can yield higher specificity in genome engineering applications, while the requirement for FokI dimerization in TALE nuclease applications is essential to avoid off-target effect. See Kim et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93, 1156-1160 (1996) and Pattanayak et al., Nature Methods 8, 765-770 (2011) each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIGS. 8A-8C are directed to high level specificity analysis processing flow for calculation of normalized expression levels illustrated with examples from experimental data. As shown in FIG. 8A, construct libraries are generated with a biased distribution of binding site sequences and random sequence 24 bp tags that will be incorporated into reporter gene transcripts (top). The transcribed tags are highly degenerate so that they should map many-to-one to Cas9 or TALE binding sequences. The construct libraries are sequenced (3^(rd) level, left) to establish which tags co-occur with binding sites, resulting in an association table of binding sites vs. transcribed tags (4^(th) level, left). Multiple construct libraries built for different binding sites may be sequenced at once using library barcodes (indicated here by the light blue and light yellow colors; levels 1-4, left). A construct library is then transfected into a cell population and a set of different Cas9/gRNA or TALE transcription factors are induced in samples of the populations (2^(nd) level, right). One sample is always induced with a fixed TALE activator targeted to a fixed binding site sequence within the construct (top level, green box); this sample serves as a positive control (green sample, also indicated by a + sign). cDNAs generated from the reporter mRNA molecules in the induced samples are then sequenced and analyzed to obtain tag counts for each tag in a sample (3^(rd) and 4^(th) level, right). As with the construct library sequencing, multiple samples, including the positive control, are sequenced and analyzed together by appending sample barcodes. Here the light red color indicates one non-control sample that has been sequenced and analyzed with the positive control (green). Because only the transcribed tags and not the construct binding sites appear in each read, the binding site vs. tag association table obtained from construct library sequencing is then used to tally up total counts of tags expressed from each binding site in each sample (5^(th) level). The tallies for each non-positive control sample are then converted to normalized expression levels for each binding site by dividing them by the tallies obtained in the positive control sample. Examples of plots of normalized expression levels by numbers of mismatches are provided in FIGS. 2B and 2E, and in FIG. 9A and FIG. 10B. Not covered in this overall process flow are several levels of filtering for erroneous tags, for tags not associable with a construct library, and for tags apparently shared with multiple binding sites. FIG. 8B depicts example distributions of percentages of binding sites by numbers of mismatches generated within a biased construct library. Left: Theoretical distribution. Right: Distribution observed from an actual TALE construct library. FIG. 8C depicts example distributions of percentages of tag counts aggregated to binding sites by numbers of mismatches. Left: Distribution observed from the positive control sample. Right: Distribution observed from a sample in which a non-control TALE was induced. As the positive control TALE binds to a fixed site in the construct, the distribution of aggregated tag counts closely reflects the distribution of binding sites in FIG. 8B, while the distribution is skewed to the left for the non-control TALE sample because sites with fewer mismatches induce higher expression levels. Below: Computing the relative enrichment between these by dividing the tag counts obtained for the target-TF by those obtained for the control-TF reveals the average expression level versus the number of mutations in the target site.

These results are further reaffirmed by specificity data generated using a different Cas9-gRNA complex. As shown in FIG. 9A, a different Cas9-gRNA complex is tolerant to 1-3 mutations in its target sequence. As shown in FIG. 9B, the Cas9-gRNA complex is also largely insensitive to point mutations, except those localized to the PAM sequence. As shown in FIG. 9C, introduction of 2 base mismatches however significantly impairs activity (in the heat plot the target sequence positions are labeled from 1-23 starting from the 5′ end). As shown in FIG. 9D, it was confirmed using a nuclease mediated HR assay that the predicted PAM for the S. pyogenes Cas9 is NGG and also NAG.

According to certain aspects, binding specificity is increased according to methods described herein. Because synergy between multiple complexes is a factor in target gene activation by Cas9N-VP64, transcriptional regulation applications of Cas9N is naturally quite specific as individual off-target binding events should have minimal effect. According to one aspect, off-set nicks are used in methods of genome-editing. A large majority of nicks seldom result in NHEJ events, (see Certo et al., Nature Methods 8, 671-676 (2011) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety) thus minimizing the effects of off-target nicking. In contrast, inducing off-set nicks to generate double stranded breaks (DSBs) is highly effective at inducing gene disruption. According to certain aspects, 5′ overhangs generate more significant NHEJ events as opposed to 3′ overhangs. Similarly, 3′ overhangs favor HR over NHEJ events, although the total number of HR events is significantly lower than when a 5′ overhang is generated. Accordingly, methods are provided for using nicks for homologous recombination and off-set nicks for generating double stranded breaks to minimize the effects of off-target Cas9-gRNA activity.

FIGS. 3A-3C are directed to multiplex off-set nicking and methods for reducing the off-target binding with the guide RNAs. As shown in FIG. 3A, the traffic light reporter was used to simultaneously assay for HR and NHEJ events upon introduction of targeted nicks or breaks. DNA cleavage events resolved through the HDR pathway restore the GFP sequence, whereas mutagenic NHEJ causes frameshifts rendering the GFP out of frame and the downstream mCherry sequence in frame. For the assay, 14 gRNAs covering a 200 bp stretch of DNA: 7 targeting the sense strand (U1-7) and 7 the antisense strand (D1-7) were designed. Using the Cas9D10A mutant, which nicks the complementary strand, different two-way combinations of the gRNAs were used to induce a range of programmed 5′ or 3′ overhangs (the nicking sites for the 14 gRNAs are indicated). As shown in FIG. 3B, inducing off-set nicks to generate double stranded breaks (DSBs) is highly effective at inducing gene disruption. Notably off-set nicks leading to 5′ overhangs result in more NHEJ events as opposed to 3′ overhangs. As shown in FIG. 3C, generating 3′ overhangs also favors the ratio of HR over NHEJ events, but the total number of HR events is significantly lower than when a 5′ overhang is generated.

FIGS. 11A-11B are directed to Cas9D10A nickase mediated NHEJ. As shown in FIG. 11A, the traffic light reporter was used to assay NHEJ events upon introduction of targeted nicks or double-stranded breaks. Briefly, upon introduction of DNA cleavage events, if the break goes through mutagenic NHEJ, the GFP is translated out of frame and the downstream mCherry sequences are rendered in frame resulting in red fluorescence. 14 gRNAs covering a 200 bp stretch of DNA: 7 targeting the sense strand (U1-7) and 7 the antisense strand (D1-7) were designed. As shown in FIG. 11B, it was observed that unlike the wild-type Cas9 which results in DSBs and robust NHEJ across all targets, most nicks (using the Cas9D10A mutant) seldom result in NHEJ events. All 14 sites are located within a contiguous 200 bp stretch of DNA and over 10-fold differences in targeting efficiencies were observed.

According to certain aspects, methods are described herein of modulating expression of a target nucleic acid in a cell that include introducing one or more, two or more or a plurality of foreign nucleic acids into the cell. The foreign nucleic acids introduced into the cell encode for a guide RNA or guide RNAs, a nuclease-null Cas9 protein or proteins and a transcriptional regulator protein or domain. Together, a guide RNA, a nuclease-null Cas9 protein and a transcriptional regulator protein or domain are referred to as a co-localization complex as that term is understood by one of skill in the art to the extent that the guide RNA, the nuclease-null Cas9 protein and the transcriptional regulator protein or domain bind to DNA and regulate expression of a target nucleic acid. According to certain additional aspects, the foreign nucleic acids introduced into the cell encode for a guide RNA or guide RNAs and a Cas9 protein nickase. Together, a guide RNA and a Cas9 protein nickase are referred to as a co-localization complex as that term is understood by one of skill in the art to the extent that the guide RNA and the Cas9 protein nickase bind to DNA and nick a target nucleic acid.

Cells according to the present disclosure include any cell into which foreign nucleic acids can be introduced and expressed as described herein. It is to be understood that the basic concepts of the present disclosure described herein are not limited by cell type. Cells according to the present disclosure include eukaryotic cells, prokaryotic cells, animal cells, plant cells, fungal cells, archael cells, eubacterial cells and the like. Cells include eukaryotic cells such as yeast cells, plant cells, and animal cells. Particular cells include mammalian cells. Further, cells include any in which it would be beneficial or desirable to regulate a target nucleic acid. Such cells may include those which are deficient in expression of a particular protein leading to a disease or detrimental condition. Such diseases or detrimental conditions are readily known to those of skill in the art. According to the present disclosure, the nucleic acid responsible for expressing the particular protein may be targeted by the methods described herein and a transcriptional activator resulting in upregulation of the target nucleic acid and corresponding expression of the particular protein. In this manner, the methods described herein provide therapeutic treatment.

Target nucleic acids include any nucleic acid sequence to which a co-localization complex as described herein can be useful to either regulate or nick. Target nucleic acids include genes. For purposes of the present disclosure, DNA, such as double stranded DNA, can include the target nucleic acid and a co-localization complex can bind to or otherwise co-localize with the DNA at or adjacent or near the target nucleic acid and in a manner in which the co-localization complex may have a desired effect on the target nucleic acid. Such target nucleic acids can include endogenous (or naturally occurring) nucleic acids and exogenous (or foreign) nucleic acids. One of skill based on the present disclosure will readily be able to identify or design guide RNAs and Cas9 proteins which co-localize to a DNA including a target nucleic acid. One of skill will further be able to identify transcriptional regulator proteins or domains which likewise co-localize to a DNA including a target nucleic acid. DNA includes genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA or exogenous DNA.

Foreign nucleic acids (i.e. those which are not part of a cell's natural nucleic acid composition) may be introduced into a cell using any method known to those skilled in the art for such introduction. Such methods include transfection, transduction, viral transduction, microinjection, lipofection, nucleofection, nanoparticle bombardment, transformation, conjugation and the like. One of skill in the art will readily understand and adapt such methods using readily identifiable literature sources.

Transcriptional regulator proteins or domains which are transcriptional activators include VP16 and VP64 and others readily identifiable by those skilled in the art based on the present disclosure.

Diseases and detrimental conditions are those characterized by abnormal loss of expression of a particular protein. Such diseases or detrimental conditions can be treated by upregulation of the particular protein. Accordingly, methods of treating a disease or detrimental condition are provided where the co-localization complex as described herein associates or otherwise binds to DNA including a target nucleic acid, and the transcriptional activator of the co-localization complex upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid. For example upregulating PRDM16 and other genes promoting brown fat differentiation and increased metabolic uptake can be used to treat metabolic syndrome or obesity. Activating anti-inflammatory genes are useful in autoimmunity and cardiovascular disease. Activating tumor suppressor genes is useful in treating cancer. One of skill in the art will readily identify such diseases and detrimental conditions based on the present disclosure.

The following examples are set forth as being representative of the present disclosure. These examples are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the present disclosure as these and other equivalent embodiments will be apparent in view of the present disclosure, figures and accompanying claims.

Example I Cas9 Mutants

Sequences homologous to Cas9 with known structure were searched to identify candidate mutations in Cas9 that could ablate the natural activity of its RuvC and HNH domains. Using HHpred (world wide website toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/hhpred), the full sequence of Cas9 was queried against the full Protein Data Bank (January 2013). This search returned two different HNH endonucleases that had significant sequence homology to the HNH domain of Cas9; PacI and a putative endonuclease (PDB IDs: 3M7K and 4H9D respectively). These proteins were examined to find residues involved in magnesium ion coordination. The corresponding residues were then identified in the sequence alignment to Cas9. Two Mg-coordinating side-chains in each structure were identified that aligned to the same amino acid type in Cas9. They are 3M7K D92 and N113, and 4H9D D53 and N77. These residues corresponded to Cas9 D839 and N863. It was also reported that mutations of PacI residues D92 and N113 to alanine rendered the nuclease catalytically deficient. The Cas9 mutations D839A and N863A were made based on this analysis. Additionally, HHpred also predicts homology between Cas9 and the N-terminus of a Thermus thermophilus RuvC (PDB ID: 4EP4). This sequence alignment covers the previously reported mutation D10A which eliminates function of the RuvC domain in Cas9. To confirm this as an appropriate mutation, the metal binding residues were determined as before. In 4EP4, D7 helps to coordinate a magnesium ion. This position has sequence homology corresponding to Cas9 D10, confirming that this mutation helps remove metal binding, and thus catalytic activity from the Cas9 RuvC domain.

Example II Plasmid Construction

The Cas9 mutants were generated using the Quikchange kit (Agilent technologies). The target gRNA expression constructs were either (1) directly ordered as individual gBlocks from IDT and cloned into the pCR-BluntII-TOPO vector (Invitrogen); or (2) custom synthesized by Genewiz; or (3) assembled using Gibson assembly of oligonucleotides into the gRNA cloning vector (plasmid #41824). The vectors for the HR reporter assay involving a broken GFP were constructed by fusion PCR assembly of the GFP sequence bearing the stop codon and appropriate fragment assembled into the EGIP lentivector from Addgene (plasmid #26777). These lentivectors were then used to establish the GFP reporter stable lines. TALENs used in this study were constructed using standard protocols. See Sanjana et al., Nature Protocols 7, 171-192 (2012) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Cas9N and MS2 VP64 fusions were performed using standard PCR fusion protocol procedures. The promoter luciferase constructs for OCT4 and REX1 were obtained from Addgene (plasmid #17221 and plasmid #17222).

Example III Cell Culture and Transfections

HEK 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Invitrogen) high glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (pen/strep, Invitrogen), and non-essential amino acids (NEAA, Invitrogen). Cells were maintained at 37° C. and 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator.

Transfections involving nuclease assays were as follows: 0.4×10⁶ cells were transfected with 2 μg Cas9 plasmid, 2 μg gRNA and/or 2 μg DNA donor plasmid using Lipofectamine 2000 as per the manufacturer's protocols. Cells were harvested 3 days after transfection and either analyzed by FACS, or for direct assay of genomic cuts the genomic DNA of ˜1×10⁶ cells was extracted using DNAeasy kit (Qiagen). For these PCR was conducted to amplify the targeting region with genomic DNA derived from the cells and amplicons were deep sequenced by MiSeq Personal Sequencer (Illumina) with coverage >200,000 reads. The sequencing data was analyzed to estimate NHEJ efficiencies.

For transfections involving transcriptional activation assays: 0.4×10⁶ cells were transfected with (1) 2 μg Cas9N-VP64 plasmid, 2 μg gRNA and/or 0.25 μg of reporter construct; or (2) 2 μg Cas9N plasmid, 2 μg MS2-VP64, 2 μg gRNA-2XMS2aptamer and/or 0.25 μg of reporter construct. Cells were harvested 24-48 hrs post transfection and assayed using FACS or immunofluorescence methods, or their total RNA was extracted and these were subsequently analyzed by RT-PCR. Here standard taqman probes from Invitrogen for OCT4 and REX1 were used, with normalization for each sample performed against GAPDH.

For transfections involving transcriptional activation assays for specificity profile of Cas9-gRNA complexes and TALEs: 0.4×10⁶ cells were transfected with (1) 2 μg Cas9N-VP64 plasmid, 2 μg gRNA and 0.25 μg of reporter library; or (2) 2 μg TALE-TF plasmid and 0.25 μg of reporter library; or (3) 2 μg control-TF plasmid and 0.25 μg of reporter library. Cells were harvested 24 hrs post transfection (to avoid the stimulation of reporters being in saturation mode). Total RNA extraction was performed using RNAeasy-plus kit (Qiagen), and standard RT-per performed using Superscript-III (Invitrogen). Libraries for next-generation sequencing were generated by targeted per amplification of the transcript-tags.

Example IV Computational and Sequence Analysis for Calculation of Cas9-TF and TALE-TF Reporter Expression Levels

The high-level logic flow for this process is depicted in FIG. 8A, and additional details are given here. For details on construct library composition, see FIGS. 8A (level 1) and 8B.

Sequencing: For Cas9 experiments, construct library (FIG. 8A, level 3, left) and reporter gene cDNA sequences (FIG. 8A, level 3, right) were obtained as 150 bp overlapping paired end reads on an Illumina MiSeq, while for TALE experiments, corresponding sequences were obtained as 51 bp non-overlapping paired end reads on an Illumina HiSeq. Construct library sequence processing: Alignment: For Cas9 experiments, novoalign V 2.07.17 (world wide website novocraft.com/main/index/php) was used to align paired reads to a set of 250 bp reference sequences that corresponded to 234 bp of the constructs flanked by the pairs of 8 bp library barcodes (see FIG. 8A, 3^(rd) level, left). In the reference sequences supplied to novoalign, the 23 bp degenerate Cas9 binding site regions and the 24 bp degenerate transcript tag regions (see FIG. 8A, first level) were specified as Ns, while the construct library barcodes were explicitly provided. For TALE experiments, the same procedures were used except that the reference sequences were 203 bp in length and the degenerate binding site regions were 18 bp vs. 23 bp in length. Validity checking: Novoalign output for comprised files in which left and right reads for each read pair were individually aligned to the reference sequences. Only read pairs that were both uniquely aligned to the reference sequence were subjected to additional validity conditions, and only read pairs that passed all of these conditions were retained. The validity conditions included: (i) Each of the two construct library barcodes must align in at least 4 positions to a reference sequence barcode, and the two barcodes must to the barcode pair for the same construct library. (ii) All bases aligning to the N regions of the reference sequence must be called by novoalign as As, Cs, Gs or Ts. Note that for neither Cas9 nor TALE experiments did left and right reads overlap in a reference N region, so that the possibility of ambiguous novoalign calls of these N bases did not arise. (iii) Likewise, no novoalign-called inserts or deletions must appear in these regions. (iv) No Ts must appear in the transcript tag region (as these random sequences were generated from As, Cs, and Gs only). Read pairs for which any one of these conditions were violated were collected in a rejected read pair file. These validity checks were implemented using custom perl scripts. Induced sample reporter gene cDNA sequence processing: Alignment: SeqPrep (downloaded from world wide website github.com/jstjohn/SeqPrep) was first used to merge the overlapping read pairs to the 79 bp common segment, after which novoalign (version above) was used to align these 79 bp common segments as unpaired single reads to a set of reference sequences (see FIG. 8A, 3^(rd) level, right) in which (as for the construct library sequencing) the 24 bp degenerate transcript tag was specified as Ns while the sample barcodes were explicitly provided. Both TALE and Cas9 cDNA sequence regions corresponded to the same 63 bp regions of cDNA flanked by pairs of 8 bp sample barcode sequences. Validity checking: The same conditions were applied as for construct library sequencing (see above) except that: (a) Here, due prior SeqPrep merging of read pairs, validity processing did not have to filter for unique alignments of both reads in a read pair but only for unique alignments of the merged reads. (b) Only transcript tags appeared in the cDNA sequence reads, so that validity processing only applied these tag regions of the reference sequences and not also to a separate binding site region. Assembly of table of binding sites vs. transcript tag associations: Custom perl was used to generate these tables from the validated construct library sequences (FIG. 8A, 4^(th) level, left). Although the 24 bp tag sequences composed of A, C, and G bases should be essentially unique across a construct library (probability of sharing=˜2.8e-11), early analysis of binding site vs. tag associations revealed that a non-negligible fraction of tag sequences were in fact shared by multiple binding sequences, likely mainly caused by a combination of sequence errors in the binding sequences, or oligo synthesis errors in the oligos used to generate the construct libraries. In addition to tag sharing, tags found associated with binding sites in validated read pairs might also be found in the construct library read pair reject file if it was not clear, due to barcode mismatches, which construct library they might be from. Finally, the tag sequences themselves might contain sequence errors. To deal with these sources of error, tags were categorized with three attributes: (i) safe vs. unsafe, where unsafe meant the tag could be found in the construct library rejected read pair file; shared vs. nonshared, where shared meant the tag was found associated with multiple binding site sequences, and 2+ vs. 1-only, where 2+ meant that the tag appeared at least twice among the validated construct library sequences and so presumed to be less likely to contain sequence errors. Combining these three criteria yielded 8 classes of tags associated with each binding site, the most secure (but least abundant) class comprising only safe, nonshared, 2+ tags; and the least secure (but most abundant) class comprising all tags regardless of safety, sharing, or number of occurrences. Computation of normalized expression levels: Custom perl code was used to implement the steps indicated in FIG. 8A, levels 5-6. First, tag counts obtained for each induced sample were aggregated for each binding site, using the binding site vs. transcript tag table previously computed for the construct library (see FIG. 8C). For each sample, the aggregated tag counts for each binding site were then divided by the aggregated tag counts for the positive control sample to generate normalized expression levels. Additional considerations relevant to these calculations included: 1. For each sample, a subset of “novel” tags were found among the validity-checked cDNA gene sequences that could not be found in the binding site vs. transcript tag association table. These tags were ignored in the subsequent calculations. 2. The aggregations of tag counts described above were performed for each of the eight classes of tags described above in binding site vs. transcript tag association table. Because the binding sites in the construct libraries were biased to generate sequences similar to a central sequence frequently, but sequences with increasing numbers of mismatches increasingly rarely, binding sites with few mismatches generally aggregated to large numbers of tags, while binding sites with more mismatches aggregated to smaller numbers. Thus, although use of the most secure tag class was generally desirable, evaluation of binding sites with two or more mismatches might be based on small numbers of tags per binding site, making the secure counts and ratios less statistically reliable even if the tags themselves were more reliable. In such cases, all tags were used. Some compensation for this consideration obtains from the fact that the number of separate aggregated tag counts for n mismatching positions grew with the number of combinations of mismatching positions (equal to

$\left. {\begin{pmatrix} L \\ n \end{pmatrix}3^{n}} \right),$

and so dramatically increases with n; thus the averages of aggregated tag counts for different numbers n of mismatches (shown in FIGS. 2B, 2E, and in FIGS. 9A, 10B) are based on a statistically very large set of aggregated tag counts for n≥2. 3. Finally, the binding site built into the TALE construct libraries was 18 bp and tag associations were assigned based on these 18 bp sequences, but some experiments were conducted with TALEs programmed to bind central 14 bp or 10 bp regions within the 18 bp construct binding site regions. In computing expression levels for these TALEs, tags were aggregated to binding sites based on the corresponding regions of the 18 bp binding sites in the association table, so that binding site mismatches outside of this region were ignored.

Example V Vector and Strain Construction

Cas9 sequences from S. thermophilus, N. meningitidis, and T. denticola were obtained from NCBI and human codon optimized using JCAT (world wide website jcat.de)²⁷ and modified to facilitate DNA synthesis and expression in E. coli. 500 bp gBlocks (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville Iowa) were joined by hierarchical overlap PCR and isothermal assembly²⁴. The resulting full-length products were subcloned into bacterial and human expression vectors. Nuclease-null Cas9 cassettes (NM: D16A D587A H588A N611A, SP: D10A D839A H840A N863A, ST1: D9A D598A H599A N622A, TD: D13A D878A H879A N902A) were constructed from these templates by standard methods.

Example VI Bacterial Plasmids

Cas9 was expressed in bacteria from a cloDF13/aadA plasmid backbone using the medium-strength proC constitutive promoter. tracrRNA cassettes, including promoters and terminators from the native bacterial loci, were synthesized as gBlocks and inserted downstream of the Cas9 coding sequence for each vector for robust tracrRNA production. When the tracrRNA cassette was expected to additionally contain a promoter in the opposite orientation, the lambda t1 terminator was inserted to prevent interference with cas9 transcription. Bacterial targeting plasmids were based on a p15A/cat backbone with the strong J23100 promoter followed by one of two 20 base pair spacer sequences (FIG. 13D) previously determined to function using SP. Spacer sequences were immediately followed by one of the three 36 base pair repeat sequences depicted in FIG. 12A. The YFP reporter vector was based on a pSC101/kan backbone with the pR promoter driving GFP and the T7 g10 RBS preceding the EYFP coding sequence, with protospacer 1 and AAAAGATT PAM inserted into the non-template strand in the 5′ UTR. Substrate plasmids for orthogonality testing in bacteria were identical to library plasmids (see below) but with the following PAMs: GAAGGGTT (NM), GGGAGGTT (SP), GAAGAATT (ST1), AAAAAGGG (TD).

Example VII Mammalian Vectors

Mammalian Cas9 expression vectors were based on pcDNA3.3-TOPO with C-terminal SV40 NLSs. sgRNAs for each Cas9 were designed by aligning crRNA repeats with tracrRNAs and fusing the 5′ crRNA repeat to the 3′ tracrRNA so as to leave a stable stem for Cas9 interaction²⁵. sgRNA expression constructs were generated by cloning 455 bp gBlocks into the pCR-BluntII-TOPO vector backbone. Spacers were identical to those used in previous work⁸. Lentivectors for the broken-GFP HR reporter assay were modified from those previously described to include appropriate PAM sequences for each Cas9 and used to establish the stable GFP reporter lines.

RNA-guided transcriptional activators consisted of nuclease-null Cas9 proteins fused to the VP64 activator and corresponding reporter constucts bearing a tdTomato driven by a minimal promoter were constructed.

Example VIII Library Construction and Transformation

Protospacer libraries were constructed by amplifying the pZE21 vector (ExpressSys, Ruelzheim, Germany) using primers (IDT, Coralville, Iowa) encoding one of the two protospacer sequences followed by 8 random bases and assembled by standard isothermal methods²⁴. Library assemblies were initially transformed into NEBTurbo cells (New England Biolabs, Ipswich Mass.), yielding >1E8 clones per library according to dilution plating, and purified by Midiprep (Qiagen, Carlsbad Calif.). Electrocompetent NEBTurbo cells containing a Cas9 expression plasmid (DS-NMcas, DS-ST1cas, or DS-TDcas) and a targeting plasmid (PM-NM!sp1, PM-NM!sp2, PM-ST1!sp1, PM-ST1!sp2, PM-TD!sp1, or PM-TD!sp2) were transformed with 200 ng of each library and recovered for 2 hours at 37° C. prior to dilution with media containing spectinomycin (50 μg/mL), chloramphenicol (30 μg/mL), and kanamycin (50 μg/mL). Serial dilutions were plated to estimate post-transformation library size. All libraries exceeded ˜1E7 clones, indicative of complete coverage of the 65,536 random PAM sequences.

Example IX High-Throughput Sequencing

Library DNA was harvested by spin columns (Qiagen, Carlsbad Calif.) after 12 hours of antibiotic selection. Intact PAMs were amplified with barcoded primers and sequences obtained from overlapping 25 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina MiSeq. MiSeq yielded 18,411,704 total reads or 9,205,852 paired-end reads with an average quality score >34 for each library. Paired end reads were merged and filtered for perfect alignment to each other, their protospacer, and the plasmid backbone. The remaining 7,652,454 merged filtered reads were trimmed to remove plasmid backbone and protospacer sequences, then used to generate position weight matrices for each PAM library. Each library combination received at least 450,000 high-quality reads.

Example X Sequence Processing

To calculate the fold depletion for each candidate PAM, we employed two scripts to filter the data. patternProp (usage: python patternProp.py [PAM] file.fastq) returns the number and fraction of reads matching each 1-base derivative of the indicated PAM. patternProp3 returns the fraction of reads matching each 1-base derivative relative to the total number of reads for the library. Spreadsheets detailing depletion ratios for each calculated PAM were used to identify the minimal fold depletion among all 1-base derivatives and thereby classify PAMs.

Example XI Repression and Orthogonality Assays in Bacteria

Cas9-mediated repression was assayed by transforming the NM expression plasmid and the YFP reporter plasmid with each of the two corresponding targeting plasmids. Colonies with matching or mismatched spacer and protospacer were picked and grown in 96-well plates. Fluorescence at 495/528 nm and absorbance at 600 nm were measured using a Synergy Neo microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski Vt.).

Orthogonality tests were performed by preparing electrocompetent NEBTurbo cells bearing all combinations of Cas9 and targeting plasmids and transforming them with matched or mismatched substrate plasmids bearing appropriate PAMs for each Cas9. Sufficient cells and dilutions were plated to ensure that at least some colonies appeared even for correct Cas9+targeting+matching protospacer combinations, which typically arise due to mutational inactivation of the Cas9 or the crRNA. Colonies were counted and fold depletion calculated for each.

Example XII Cell Culture and Transfections

HEK 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Invitrogen) high glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (pen/strep, Invitrogen), and non-essential amino acids (NEAA, Invitrogen). Cells were maintained at 37° C. and 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator.

Transfections involving nuclease assays were as follows: 0.4×10⁶ cells were transfected with 2 μg Cas9 plasmid, 2 μg gRNA and/or 2 μg DNA donor plasmid using Lipofectamine 2000 as per the manufacturer's protocols. Cells were harvested 3 days after transfection and either analyzed by FACS, or for direct assay of genomic cuts the genomic DNA of ˜1×10⁶ cells was extracted using DNAeasy kit (Qiagen).

For transfections involving transcriptional activation assays: 0.4×10⁶ cells were transfected with 2 μg Cas9_(N-)VP64 plasmid, 2 μg gRNA and/or 0.25 μg of reporter construct. Cells were harvested 24-48 hrs post transfection and assayed using FACS or immunofluorescence methods, or their total RNA was extracted and these were subsequently analyzed by RT-PCR.

Example XIII Selecting Putatively Orthogonal Cas9 Proteins

Cas9 RNA binding and sgRNA specificity is primarily determined by the 36 base pair repeat sequence in crRNA. Known Cas9 genes were examined for highly divergent repeats in their adjacent CRISPR loci. Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR1 Cas9 proteins (SP and ST1)^(6, 22) and two additional Cas9 proteins from Neisseria meningitidis (NM) and Treponema denticola (TD) were selected whose loci harbor repeats that differ by at least 13 nucleotides from one another and from those of SP and ST1 (FIG. 12A).

Example XIV PAM Characterization

Cas9 proteins will only target dsDNA sequences flanked by a 3′ PAM sequence specific to the Cas9 of interest. Of the four Cas9 variants, only SP has an experimentally characterized PAM, while the ST1 PAM and, very recently, the NM PAM were deduced bioinformatically. SP is readily targetable due to its short PAM of NGG¹⁰, while ST1 and NM targeting are less readily targetable because of PAMs of NNAGAAW and NNNNGATT, respectively^(22, 23). Bioinformatic approaches inferred more stringent PAM requirements for Cas9 activity than are empirically necessary for effector cleavage due to the spacer acquisition step. Because the PAM sequence is the most frequent target of mutation in escape phages, redundancy in the acquired PAM would preclude resistance. A library-based approach was adopted to comprehensively characterize these sequences in bacteria using high-throughput sequencing.

Genes encoding ST1, NM, and TD were assembled from synthetic fragments and cloned into bacterial expression plasmids along with their associated tracrRNAs (FIG. 12B). Two SP-functional spacers were selected for incorporation into the six targeting plasmids. Each targeting plasmid encodes a constitutively expressed crRNA in which one of the two spacers is followed by the 36 base-pair repeat sequence specific to a Cas9 protein (FIG. 12B). Plasmid libraries containing one of the two protospacers followed by all possible 8 base pair PAM sequences were generated by PCR and assembly²⁴. Each library was electroporated into E. coli cells harboring Cas9 expression and targeting plasmids, for a total of 12 combinations of Cas9 protein, spacer, and protospacer. Surviving library plasmids were selectively amplified by barcoded PCR and sequenced by MiSeq to distinguish between functional PAM sequences, which are depleted only when the spacer and protospacer match (FIG. 12C-12D), from nonfunctional PAMs, which are never depleted (FIG. 12D-12E). To graphically depict the importance of each nucleotide at every position, the log relative frequency of each base for matched spacer-protospacer pairs relative to the corresponding mismatched case was plotted (FIGS. 13A-13F).

NM and ST1 recognize PAMs that are less stringent and more complex than earlier bioinformatic predictions, suggesting that requirements for spacer acquisition are more stringent than those for effector cleavage. NM primarily requires a single G nucleotide positioned five bases from the 3′ end of the protospacer (FIG. 13A), while ST1 and TD each require at least three specific bases (FIG. 5 b-c ). Sorting results by position allowed quantification of depletion of any PAM sequence from each protospacer library (FIGS. 13D-13F). All three enzymes cleaved protospacer 2 more effectively than protospacer 1 for nearly all PAMs, with ST1 exhibiting an approximately 10-fold disparity. However, there was also considerable PAM-dependent variation in this interaction. For example, NM cleaved protospacers 1 and 2 approximately equally when they were followed by sequences matching TNNNGNNN, but was 10-fold more active in cleaving protospacer 2 when the PAMs matched ANNNGNNN.

Results highlight the difficulty of defining a single acceptable PAM for a given Cas9. Not only do activity levels depend on the protospacer sequence, but specific combinations of unfavorable PAM bases can significantly reduce activity even when the primary base requirements are met. We initially identified PAMs as patterns that underwent >100-fold average depletion with the lower-activity protospacer 1 and >50-fold depletion of all derivatives with one additional base fixed (Table 1, plain text). While these levels are presumably sufficient to defend against targets in bacteria, particular combinations of deleterious mutations dramatically reduced activity. For example, NM depleted sequences matching NCCAGGTN by only 4-fold. A more stringent threshold requiring >500-fold depletion of matching sequences and >200-fold depletion of one-base derivatives was defined for applications requiring high affinity (Table 1, bolded).

TABLE 1 NM ST1 TD NNNNGANN NNAGAA NAAAAN NNNNGTTN NNAGGA NAAANC NNNNGNNT NNGGAA NANAAC NNNNGTNN NNANAA NNAAAC NNNNGNTN NNGGGA

Example XV Transcriptional Regulation in Bacteria

A nuclease-null variant of SP has been demonstrated to repress targeted genes in bacteria with an efficacy dependent upon the position of the targeted protospacer and PAM¹⁸. Because the PAM of NM occurs more frequently than that of SP, nuclease-null version may be similarly capable of targeted repression. The catalytic residues of the RuvC and HNH nuclease domains were identified by sequence homology and inactivated to generate a putative nuclease-null NM. To create a suitable reporter, protospacer 1 was inserted with an appropriate PAM into the non-template strand within the 5′UTR of a YFP reporter plasmid (FIG. 14A). These constructs were cotransformed into E. coli together with each of the two NM targeting plasmids used previously and measured their comparative fluorescence. Cells with matching spacer and protospacer exhibited ˜22-fold weaker fluorescence than the corresponding mismatched case (FIG. 14B). These results suggest that NM can function as an easily targeted repressor to control transcription in bacteria, substantially increasing the number of endogenous genes that can be subjected to Cas9-mediated repression.

Example XVI Orthogonality in Bacteria

A set of Cas9 proteins were selected for their disparate crRNA repeat sequences. To verify that they are in fact orthogonal, each Cas9 expression plasmid was co-transformed with all four targeting plasmids containing spacer 2. These cells were challenged by transformation of substrate plasmids containing either protospacer 1 or protospacer 2 and a suitable PAM. Plasmid depletion was observed exclusively when each Cas9 was paired with its own crRNA, demonstrating that all four constructs are indeed orthogonal in bacteria (FIG. 15 ).

Example XVII Genome Editing in Human Cells

These Cas9 variants were then used to engineer human cells. Single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were constructed from the corresponding crRNAs and tracrRNAs for NM and ST1, the two smaller Cas9 orthologs, by examining complementary regions between crRNA and tracrRNA²⁵ and fusing the two sequences via a stem-loop at various fusion junctions analogous to those of the sgRNAs created for SP. In certain instances where multiple successive uracils caused Pol III termination in the expression system, multiple single-base mutants were generated. The complete 3′ tracrRNA sequence was always included, as truncations are known to be detrimental⁸. All sgRNAs were assayed for activity along with their corresponding Cas9 protein using a previously described homologous recombination assay in 293 cells⁸. Briefly, a genomically integrated non-fluorescent GFP reporter line was constructed for each Cas9 protein in which the GFP coding sequence was interrupted by an insert encoding a stop codon and protospacer sequence with functional PAM. Reporter lines were transfected with expression vectors encoding a Cas9 protein and corresponding sgRNA along with a repair donor capable of restoring fluorescence upon nuclease-induced homologous recombination (FIG. 16A). ST1- and NM-mediated editing was observed at levels comparable to those induced by SP. The ST1 sgRNA with 5 successive uracils functioned efficiently, suggesting that Pol III termination did not occur at levels sufficient to impair activity. Full-length crRNA-tracrRNA fusions were active in all instances and are useful for chimeric sgRNA design. Both NM and ST1 are capable of efficient gene editing in human cells using chimeric guide RNAs.

Example XVIII Cas9 Orthogonality in Mammalian Cells

Having discovered highly effective sgRNAs for NM and ST1 activity in human cells, it was verified that none of the three proteins can be guided by the sgRNAs of the others. The same homologous recombination assay was used to measure the comparative efficiency of NM, SP, and ST1 in combination with each of the three sgRNAs. All three Cas9 proteins were determined to be fully orthogonal to one another, demonstrating that they are capable of targeting distinct and non-overlapping sets of sequences within the same cell (FIG. 16B). To contrast the roles of sgRNA and PAM in orthogonal targeting, a variety of downstream PAM sequences with SP and ST1 and their respective sgRNAs were tested. Both a matching sgRNA and a valid PAM are required for activity, with the orthogonality determined almost entirely by the specific sgRNA affinity for the corresponding Cas9.

Example XIX Transcriptional Activation in Human Cells

NM and ST1 mediate transcriptional activation in human cells. Nuclease-null NM and ST1 genes were fused to the VP64 activator domain at their C-termini to yield putative RNA-guided activators modeled after the SP activator. Reporter constructs for activation consisted of a protospacer with an appropriate PAM inserted upstream of the tdTomato coding region. Vectors expressing an RNA-guided transcriptional activator, an sgRNA, and an appropriate reporter were cotransfected and the extent of transcriptional activation measured by FACS (FIG. 17A). In each case, robust transcriptional activation by all three Cas9 variants was observed (FIG. 17B). Each Cas9 activator stimulated transcription only when paired with its corresponding sgRNA.

Example XX Discussion

Using two distinct protospacers for comprehensive PAM characterization allowed investigation of the complexities governing protospacer and PAM recognition. Differential protospacer cleavage efficiencies exhibited a consistent trend across diverse Cas9 proteins, although the magnitude of the disparity varied considerably between orthologs. This pattern suggests that sequence-dependent differences in D-loop formation or stabilization determine the basal targeting efficiency for each protospacer, but that additional Cas9 or repeat-dependent factors also play a role. Similarly, numerous factors preclude efforts to describe PAM recognition with a single sequence motif. Individual bases adjacent to the primary PAM recognition determinants can combine to dramatically decrease overall affinity. Indeed, certain PAMs appear to interact nonlinearly with the spacer or protospacer to determine the overall activity. Moreover, different affinity levels may be required for distinct activities across disparate cell types. Finally, experimentally identified PAMs required fewer bases than those inferred from bioinformatic analyses, suggesting that spacer acquisition requirements differ from those for effector cleavage.

This difference is most significant for the Cas9 protein from Neisseria meningitidis, which has fewer PAM requirements relative to both its bioinformatic prediction and to the currently popular Cas9 from S. pyogenes. Its discovery considerably expands the number of sequences that can be readily targeted with a Cas9 protein. At 3.25 kbp in length, it is also 850 bp smaller than SP, a significant advantage when gene delivery capabilities are limiting. Most notably, both NM and ST1 are small enough to fit into an AAV vector for therapeutic applications, while NM may represent a more suitable starting point for directed evolution efforts designed to alter PAM recognition or specificity.

The following references are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

REFERENCES

-   1. Bhaya, D., Davison, M. & Barrangou, R. CRISPR-Cas systems in     bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and     regulation. Annual review of genetics 45, 273-297 (2011). -   2. Wiedenheft, B., Sternberg, S. H. & Doudna, J. A. RNA-guided     genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea. Nature 482,     331-338 (2012). -   3. Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA     ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for     adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy     of Sciences of the United States of America 109, E2579-2586 (2012). -   4. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease     in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012). -   5. Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M. & Kim, J. S. Targeted genome     engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease.     Nature biotechnology 31, 230-232 (2013). -   6. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas     systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013). -   7. Ding, Q. et al. Enhanced efficiency of human pluripotent stem     cell genome editing through replacing TALENs with CRISPRs. Cell stem     cell 12, 393-394 (2013). -   8. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9.     Science 339, 823-826 (2013). -   9. Wang, H. et al. One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in     Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering. Cell 153,     910-918 (2013). -   10. Jiang, W., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L. A.     RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems.     Nature biotechnology 31, 233-239 (2013). -   11. Boch, J. et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of     TAL-type III effectors. Science 326, 1509-1512 (2009). -   12. Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. F., 3rd ZFN, TALEN, and     CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends in     biotechnology (2013). -   13. Hockemeyer, D. et al. Efficient targeting of expressed and     silent genes in human ESCs and iPSCs using zinc-finger nucleases.     Nature biotechnology 27, 851-857 (2009). -   14. Kim, Y. G., Cha, J. & Chandrasegaran, S. Hybrid restriction     enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proceedings     of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America     93, 1156-1160 (1996). -   15. Moscou, M. J. & Bogdanove, A. J. A simple cipher governs DNA     recognition by TAL effectors. Science 326, 1501 (2009). -   16. Porteus, M. H. & Carroll, D. Gene targeting using zinc finger     nucleases. Nature biotechnology 23, 967-973 (2005). -   17. Urnov, F. D. et al. Highly efficient endogenous human gene     correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 435, 646-651     (2005). -   18. Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform     for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152,     1173-1183 (2013). -   19. Beerli, R. R., Dreier, B. & Barbas, C. F., 3rd Positive and     negative regulation of endogenous genes by designed transcription     factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the     United States of America 97, 1495-1500 (2000). -   20. Podgornaia, A. I. & Laub, M. T. Determinants of specificity in     two-component signal transduction. Current opinion in microbiology     16, 156-162 (2013). -   21. Purnick, P. E. & Weiss, R. The second wave of synthetic biology:     from modules to systems. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology 10,     410-422 (2009). -   22. Horvath, P. et al. Diversity, activity, and evolution of CRISPR     loci in Streptococcus thermophilus. Journal of bacteriology 190,     1401-1412 (2008). -   23. Zhang, Y. et al. Processing-Independent CRISPR RNAs Limit     Natural Transformation in Neisseria meningitidis. Molecular cell 50,     488-503 (2013). -   24. Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to     several hundred kilobases. Nature methods 6, 343-345 (2009). -   25. Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded     small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602-607 (2011). -   26. Bondy-Denomy, J., Pawluk, A., Maxwell, K. L. & Davidson, A. R.     Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune     system. Nature 493, 429-432 (2013). -   27. Grote, A. et al. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a     target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic acids research     33, W526-531 (2005). 

1. A method of modulating expression of two or more target nucleic acids in a cell comprising introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs complementary to the two or more target nucleic acids, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding proteins that respectively bind to the two or more target nucleic acids and are guided by the two or more RNAs, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more transcriptional regulator proteins or domains, wherein the RNAs, the orthogonal RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding proteins, and the transcriptional regulator proteins or domains are expressed, wherein two or more co-localization complexes form between an RNA, an orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein, a transcriptional regulator protein or domain and a target nucleic acid and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the foreign nucleic acid encoding an orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to the orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a eukaryotic cell.
 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell.
 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the RNA is between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides.
 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the RNA is between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.
 8. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator.
 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid.
 10. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition.
 11. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional repressor.
 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain downregulates expression of the target nucleic acid.
 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain downregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition.
 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.
 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA.
 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.
 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.
 18. The method of claim 1 wherein a first target nucleic acid is activated and a second target nucleic acid is repressed.
 19. The method of claim 1 wherein a first plurality of target nucleic acids are repressed and a second plurality of target nucleic acids are repressed.
 20. The method of claim 1 wherein a first one or more target nucleic acids are activated and a second one or more target nucleic acids are repressed.
 21. A method of altering one or more target nucleic acids in a cell simultaneous with regulating expression of one or more target nucleic acids in a cell comprising introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with at least one RNA being complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be altered and at least one RNA being complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be regulated, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding 1) one orthogonal RNA-guided protein nickase having one inactive nuclease domain and being guided by the one or more RNAs complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be altered, and 2) one or more orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding proteins that bind to and are guided by the one or more RNAs complementary to the target nucleic acids to be regulated, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more transcriptional regulator proteins or domains, wherein the RNAs, the orthogonal RNA guided protein nickase, the orthogonal RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding proteins, and the transcriptional regulator proteins or domains are expressed, wherein at least one co-localization complex forms between an RNA, an orthogonal RNA guided protein nickase, and a target nucleic acid to be altered and wherein the protein nickase nicks the target nucleic acid to be altered, wherein at least one co-localization complex forms between an RNA, an orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein, a transcriptional regulator protein or domain and a target nucleic acid to be regulated and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid to be regulated.
 22. A method of altering one or more target nucleic acids in a cell simultaneous with regulating expression of one or more target nucleic acids in a cell comprising introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs with at least one RNA being complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be altered and at least one RNA being complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be regulated, introducing into the cell a second foreign nucleic acid encoding 1) one orthogonal RNA-guided protein nuclease and being guided by the one or more RNAs complementary to the one or more target nucleic acids to be altered, and 2) one or more orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding proteins that bind to and are guided by the one or more RNAs complementary to the target nucleic acids to be regulated, introducing into the cell a third foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more transcriptional regulator proteins or domains, wherein the RNAs, the orthogonal RNA guided protein nuclease, the orthogonal RNA guided nuclease-null DNA binding proteins, and the transcriptional regulator proteins or domains are expressed, wherein at least one co-localization complex forms between an RNA, an orthogonal RNA guided protein nuclease, and a target nucleic acid to be altered and wherein the nuclease cuts the target nucleic acid to be altered, wherein at least one co-localization complex forms between an RNA, an orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein, a transcriptional regulator protein or domain and a target nucleic acid to be regulated and wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain regulates expression of the target nucleic acid to be regulated.
 23. A cell comprising a first foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNAs complementary to two or more respective target nucleic acids, a second foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding proteins, and a third foreign nucleic acid encoding two or more transcriptional regulator proteins or domains wherein each RNA, orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein and transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a member of a co-localization complex for a respective target nucleic acid.
 24. The cell of claim 23 wherein the foreign nucleic acid encoding an orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein further encodes the transcriptional regulator protein or domain fused to the orthogonal RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein.
 25. The cell of claim 23 wherein the foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs further encodes a target of an RNA-binding domain and the foreign nucleic acid encoding the transcriptional regulator protein or domain further encodes an RNA-binding domain fused to the transcriptional regulator protein or domain.
 26. The cell of claim 23 wherein the cell is a eukaryotic cell.
 27. The cell of claim 23 wherein the cell is a yeast cell, a plant cell or an animal cell.
 28. The cell of claim 23 wherein the RNA includes between about 10 to about 500 nucleotides.
 29. The cell of claim 23 wherein the RNA includes between about 20 to about 100 nucleotides.
 30. The cell of claim 23 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain is a transcriptional activator.
 31. The cell of claim 23 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid.
 32. The cell of claim 23 wherein the transcriptional regulator protein or domain upregulates expression of the target nucleic acid to treat a disease or detrimental condition.
 33. The cell of claim 23 wherein the target nucleic acid is associated with a disease or detrimental condition.
 34. The cell of claim 23 wherein the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA.
 35. The cell of claim 23 wherein the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.
 36. The cell of claim 23 wherein the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.
 37. The method of claim 1 wherein the RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein is a DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR system.
 38. The method of claim 1 wherein the RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein is an orthogonal nuclease-null Cas9 protein.
 39. The cell of claim 23 wherein the RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein is a DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR system.
 40. The cell of claim 23 wherein the RNA guided nuclease null DNA binding protein is an orthogonal nuclease-null Cas9 protein. 